And with DeepPRIME XD it uses AI-powered noise reduction and detail enhancement. So I can't compare them before making the choice. Its lens correction profiles tackle global lens sharpness issues but also edge softness, all via DxO’s correction profiles developed in-house for tens of thousands of camera-lens combinations. I'm trying the PureRaw 3 demo, but foolishly deleted the Demo of PhotoLab 6 Elite without fully testing it. PureRaw 3 is more expensive than the PhotoLab upgrade, it has a simpler interface than PhotoLab, but is less flexible. But - on my creaky old pc it takes up to 6 minutes. This gives a noticeably better result than DeepPrime. Prosessing an ORF file with DeepPrime takes about 2 minutes on my 7 year old Windows computer, but the results are worth it.Ī couple of years on we have PhotoLab 6 and PureRaw 3, both with DeepPrime XD.
Pure, flawless, and noise-free RAW photos DxO PureRAW’s artificial intelligence strikes the perfect balance between preserving detail and eliminating noise. A couple of years ago I started to use DXO Photolab 4 as a plug-in, which enables me to shoot at ISO 6400 with confidence - the results are amazing. Create better RAW files before retouching them in Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, or other programs thanks to DxO’s exclusive demosaicing, denoising, and lens defect correction technologies. My processing is mostly in Lightroom (subscription), with the occasional round trip into Photoshop. I'm using an Oly 1.3 and 5.3, always shooting in RAW. My question - one the same computer, will Photolab 6 Elite run significantly slower than PureRaw 3 using the same settings?
0 kommentar(er)
